A WITNESS in the Elaine Doyle murder trial appeared visibly shocked after hearing his former prison friend had accused him of murdering the teenager more than 27 years ago.
Robert Brown, 47, then asked to be allowed to leave the witness box when he also discovered his accuser, Brian Buckley, was serving a life sentence for murder.
Buckley was convicted of sexually assaulting and strangling a 25-year-old mother of two in Wrexham, Wales - a case defence QC Donald Findlay claimed bore some similarities to Elaine's murder.
Buckley had accused Mr Brown of the murder in 2008 following a TV programme about unsolved killings.
After hearing that, Mr Brown said: "I cannot believe it. It is the first I have heard of this." He then turned to judge Lord Stewart to ask: "Can I have a break?"
On trial is John Docherty, now of Dunoon. The 49-year-old, denies murder.
Elaine's naked body was found yards from her home in Ardgowan Street, Greenock, early in June 2, 1986.
In the early hours of that morning Mr Brown and Buckley had been prowling the streets in the area on a thieving expedition.
A couple of days later they came to blows and Buckley left Greenock.
The High Court in Edinburgh heard the two youths had met in Polmont Young Offenders' Institution earlier in 1986 where they were serving sentences.
Mr Brown, who now lives in London, told police in a statement in November 1986: "I really don't think Brian would commit a murder, although he is a bit of a nutcase."
Mr Findlay asked him yesterday : "As far as you know, was Mr Buckley ever in the vicinity of Ardgowan Street on the night of the murder?"
Mr Brown replied: "I don't know where he went."
Mr Findlay asked: "Did you know he blamed you for the murder?"
Mr Brown replied: "No".
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article