A CEASEFIRE agreement has been reached in the central Syrian city of Homs, according to local activists and a Lebanese TV channel that backs president Bashar al Assad's government.
The deal calls a truce between pro-Assad forces and rebels holed up in Homs' old quarter, activist Beibars Tilawi said. The Hezbollah-owned channel al Manar said the same thing.
Mr Tilawi said if the truce holds, hundreds of fighters will be allowed to leave Homs and head to rebel-controlled areas north of the city.
The agreement could end the longest-running clashes between pro-government forces and rebels since the uprising against Mr Assad's rule began in March 2013.
Earlier, 18 people, including 11 children, were killed in car-bomb attacks in two Syrian villages, state-run television said.
The attacks happened in Jabreen and Humayri, villages that are under government control.
There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the bombings, but al Qaida- backed rebels of the Nusra Front have planted several car bombs in recent weeks.
Rights groups have condemned Mr Assad's government and rebels for attacks that overwhelmingly kill civilians.
Bringing the country's third-largest city under loyalist control would be a significant victory for Mr Assad, weeks before presidential elections on June 3.
Homs, in the central western plains of Syria, was one of the first cities to rise up against his rule three years ago. It was nicknamed the "capital of the revolution".
After waves of anti-Assad protests by its residents, it was the first city largely taken over by armed rebels as the uprising evolved into outright civil war.
Ever since, Mr Assad's forces have been engaged in gruelling urban warfare to try to wrest it back.
For months, rebels have been isolated and blockaded inside a string of Homs neighbourhoods centred around its historic old quarters, battered by heavy government air strikes and artillery.
Mr Tilawi said: "This isn't what we wanted. But it's all we could get."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article