POLICE Scotland has overhauled its stop-and-search policy in an effort to stop officers from fiddling the figures by entering bogus information into the force's computer system.
The force now requires officers to record the names and addresses of individuals searched. Previously, this did not happen, allowing some officers to make up stop-and-search entries and falsely inflate statistics.
MSPs welcomed the move yesterday, with Graeme Pearson, Scottish Labour's justice spokesman and a former senior police officer, saying it was "more robust".
He said: "There is no point in hiding behind misleading figures that contradict the public's own experiences of the police.
"Only openness and transparency will build confidence in our communities."
Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman Alison McInnes said: "This change is long overdue. However, we still don't know the extent of the culture of 'ghost entries' or how it has skewed the already worrying number of voluntary stop and searches in Scotland."
Searches can either be statutory - which require an officer to have reasonable grounds of suspicion - or consensual, which must be based on permission of the person being searched.
In the first nine months after the creation of Police Scotland, more than 500,000 searches were recorded. However, former officers told our sister paper The Sunday Herald the figure was bogus as many of the searches were made up.
It has now emerged Police Scotland last week changed the system, so names, addresses and dates of birth are also included.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article