ACCESS to the European Union single market has failed to benefit UK trade, analysis by a think-tank has suggested.
The study indicated pro-European claims that the British economy gained a trade advantage by being a member of the 28-state bloc was "empty rhetoric".
The report by centre-right think-tank Civitas said Britain's trade with other EU nations accounts for no more of its trade with all leading economies than it did on joining the European Economic Community in 1973. Meanwhile, exports to non-EU nations Iceland, Norway and Switzerland have increased enormously over the same period.
The report analysed and compared figures since 1960 and concluded there was no "insider advantage" to being within the EU in terms of exports.
Report author Michael Burrage, a director of Asian market research firm Cimigo, said: "Insider advantages will only rate inclusion in any serious assessment of the economic case for EU membership when those who make claims about them identify and document specific advantages for UK exports.
"Until they do so, we may reasonably conclude that they cannot form a sensible basis of public policy decisions and do not contribute to an intelligent debate about the merits of EU membership.
"That debate has to recognise that, thus far, the single market has not enabled UK exports of goods or services to other members to grow at a faster rate than those of non-member exporters, nor at a faster rate than UK exports to non-member markets."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article