A VOLUNTEERS' group which aims to improve a public park is considering disbanding after claiming to have been ignored by the local authority that set it up.
East Renfrewshire Council plans to build a new £22 million high school in Cowan Park, the largest green space in Barrhead.
The authority is pushing ahead with its proposals even after it emerged that the proposed site is Common Good Land. The Friends of Cowan Park group, which says it brought the land's protected status to the council's attention, has claimed that it has been excluded from the decision-making process by the authority.
While it says it does not oppose the building of the new school, the group does have concerns over the location of sports pitches.
The group, which was set up in 2012 with a mandate to help manage and improve the area, feared it could be left with a legal bill of up to £25,000 if it responded to East Renfrewshire Council's petition to the Court of Session to obtain permission to build on the land.
It is the latest dispute between the council and grassroots organisations under its control, with two community councils in the area facing being stripped of their funding and rights, such as the ability to consult on planning, licensing and education matters and be granted the free use of council facilities, after they attempted to change their constitutions.
Alan Kirkwood, chair of the friends group, said: "We have decided to continue for now, although we don't feel there is a lot left. We could disband — that is an option we are considering. They seem to have a problem with grassroots organisations, they are arrogant, dismissive and have treated us with no respect."
A spokeswoman for East Renfreshire Council said that there was "no suggestion" that the council intended to claim court costs from the friends group, although a "standard clause" included in all court applications states expenses would be sought from any party offering opposition.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article