LABOUR veteran MP Paul Flynn walked out of a Commons committee after accusing its chairman of using it as a stunt to embarrass the Scottish Parliament.
During a session of the Public Administration Committee, examining impartiality and the role of the civil service during the independence referendum, Mr Flynn focused on the controversial publication of a memo by Sir Nicholas Macpherson, the Treasury's top civil servant, arguing against a currency union.
Mr Flynn, who represents Newport West in South Wales, said there was an "axis of opposition" to Scottish independence from the English Establishment.
Sir Bob Kerslake, head of the UK Civil Service, said: "Nicholas MacPherson did not align himself on the issue of the referendum. What he did was to make known publicly his advice on the issue of currency. He thought this was a sufficiently important issue to publish his advice."
Sir Bob stressed that such advice was only published when circumstances were deemed "exceptional".
But Mr Flynn said the advice had come down conveniently on the anti-independence side. "Isn't this an example of someone being in breach of the civil service code for impartiality?"
Sir Bob strongly denied this and said Sir Nicholas was advising on what options a government should take on the currency.
After Mr Flynn then turned his fire on what he branded Sir Bob's "sycophantic" article in praise of Margaret Thatcher, Bernard Jenkin, the Conservative committee chairman, sought to call another MP but Mr Flynn tried to continue his line of questioning.
As Mr Jenkin called "order", the Labour backbencher said: "You are using this committee as a stunt to try to embarrass the Scottish Parliament and the idea of devolution." Moments later the Labour backbencher left.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article