THE credibility of the security and intelligence agencies is being hit by ineffective oversight, an influential group of MPs has said.
Scrutinising the work of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ should not be undertaken exclusively by the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), the Home Affairs Select Committee said in its latest report.
And the MPs have recommended that membership of the nine-strong ISC should be elected like select committees and the chair should always be a member of the Commons, subject to election by the whole House.
In addition, it said the ISC chair should always be a member of the largest opposition party.
The report comes after the current ISC chair Sir Malcolm Rifkind defended his committee's role and powers in a speech to Oxford University's Wadham College.
Alluding to John Le Carre's fictional Cold War spy George Smiley, committee chairman Keith Vaz MP said: "The current system of oversight is designed to scrutinise the work of George Smiley not the 21st century reality of the security and intelligence services.
"The agencies are at the cutting edge of sophistication and are owed an equally refined system of democratic scrutiny.
"It is an embarrassing indictment of our system that some in the media published leaked information to ensure that matters were heard in Parliament.
"The Intelligence and Security Committee should be given a democratic mandate in the same way as other select committees.
"We will then be able to robustly defend our methods of scrutiny and better serve those who protect us, and the public."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article