NO patients will suffer financial loss as a result of implementing the recommendations contained in a review of long-term care, according to Health Secretary Alex Neil.
Mr Neil stressed that there was "absolutely no intention" to charge people for primary health care needs while patient safety and quality of care will remain the Scottish Government's "over-riding concerns".
The Health Secretary was making a statement to Holyrood on the future of care services following the publication of a review into the long-term care of chronically-ill people by Ian Anderson, a past president of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow.
Mr Neil ordered a review of the system last June after a 27 percent fall in the number of people receiving help was reported.
Concern was raised that the system was not being applied properly and that people may have had to pay for services they should have had free of charge.
Continuing care is a fully-funded package arranged by the health service where someone has been assessed as having unpredictable and very high level clinical care needs.
The review said the system should be completely revised and re-branded as "hospital-based complex clinical care".
Mr Neil told MSPs that the Scottish Government accepted Mr Anderson's recommendations to overhaul the system.
"Patients being treated as part of the proposed continuing care programme will only remain in hospital for as long as that is clinically necessary," Mr Neil said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article