THE dramatic sacking of the general secretary of a Scottish teaching union just weeks after taking up her post is to be discussed in private at the organisation's annual conference.
The behind closed doors session will give members of the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association (SSTA) an opportunity to discuss the shock decision to dismiss Sheila Mechan after only three weeks in the job.
In April, a union spokesman described the decision as "regrettable but necessary" after the breakdown of "crucial working relationships" between Ms Mechan and other officials.
However, Ms Mechan is still considering legal action over the decision,.
She said it had not given her the opportunity to develop her role.
Alan McKenzie, the current acting general secretary, who has taken over until a permanent successor is found, will tell members at the annual congress today that the issue will be discussed in private.
The only reference to the sacking of Ms Mechan in his speech is expected to be a reference to continuing good working relationships with the rival Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union and its general secretary Larry Flanagan.
In the aftermath of her sacking Ms Mechan accused the SSTA of being "obsessed" with the EIS to the detriment of its own members.
However, Mr McKenzie is expected to tell the congress in Peebles: "We also continue to work closely with our colleagues in the EIS.
"I can only commend the open and frank attitude of the EIS general secretary and the support he has given me in difficult times.
"The message that we send is clear. We wish to continue to strengthen our relationship with you in spite of messages... by former employees."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article