A NATIONALIST councillor found to have behaved aggressively towards people objecting to plans for a new pub was yesterday banned from all council meetings for five months.
Senior SNP councillor Alasdair MacPherson, who represents Bannockburn, was judged to have breached the Councillors' Code of Conduct when dealing with members of the public who were objecting to plans to convert a former Inland Revenue office block into a 700-capacity "super-pub".
The Stirling Council member was referred to the Ethical Standards Commissioner after complaints were received from members of the public about his behaviour during the meeting, which was considering pub chain JD Wetherspoons' plans for the office block, in Spittal Street, in the picturesque old town of Stirling.
After considering the referral, the Commissioner for Ethical Standards, Stuart Allan, reported Councillor MacPherson to the Standards Commission for Scotland (SCS) for breaking the Code of Conduct, which sets out rules governing the behaviour of councillors.
At an SCS hearing in Bridge of Allan Councillor MacPherson was banned from attending all council and committee meetings for five months.
The ban will come into effect on Friday.
The chairman of the panel and convener for the SCS, Ian Gordon, said: "He failed to respect members of the public at that meeting, who were objectors, and he behaved in an aggressive manner to a community council officer. We have taken into account that Councillor MacPherson apologised to the person in question."
The pub plan finally got the green light last May, despite pub-chain rivals Greene King, who have six outlets within 400 yards of Spittal Street, seeking a judicial review.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article