A SOUTH African court has ordered Olympic and Paralympic track star Oscar Pistorius to undergo evaluation for mental illness, a move which could determine whether he lacked criminal capacity when he shot dead his girlfriend.
The prosecution had asked for the evaluation after a psychiatrist told the court on Monday Pistorius, who is on trial for the murder of Reeva Steenkamp, suffered from an anxiety disorder.
Prosecutor Gerrie Nel has argued he wanted to prevent the 27-year-old sprinter, who faces life in prison if convicted, from later appealing on the basis of a disturbed mental condition.
Defence lawyer Barry Roux had argued against the motion, saying it was premature to have the evaluation before he called other witnesses.
But Judge Thokozile Masipa ruled a mental assessment would ensure Pistorius gets a fair trial, adding she thought it "strange" the defence had opposed the motion.
Ms Masipa said the court would hand down the details of how the assessment would be carried out on Tuesday. It would be preferable for Pistorius to undergo the evaluation as an outpatient, she said.
Pistorius, who has frequently vomited into a bucket and broken down sobbing during the trial, showed no emotion as he stood in the dock listening to Ms Masipa's ruling.
His uncle Arnold Pistorius said: "As a family we are comforted by the thoroughness and detail of this judgement."
The evaluation is expected to take around 30 days and will prolong the trial which began on March 3.
The court will likely use the evaluation to determine whether Pistorius lacked "criminal capacity" at the time of the shooting due to his mental disorder, South African legal expert John Welch said.
In that case, Pistorius could be sent to a mental institution for the rest of his life. If Pistorius is judged to have a "diminished criminal capacity" the trial would continue, although the track star could receive a lesser sentence if convicted.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article