MINISTERS have been warned by MPs that they must obtain firmer assur-ances from US pharma-ceuticals giant Pfizer over its long-term commitment to the UK if the firm's proposed takeover of AstraZeneca is to be allowed.
The Commons Science and Technology Committee said the promises made so far by Pfizer, which are limited to just five years, were of "little value" in an industry which measures progress in decades rather than years.
The committee is one of two cross-party House of Commons select committees to have taken evidence this week from the bosses of the two firms regarding the takeover, which is being strongly resisted by AstraZeneca.
In a letter to Science Minister David Willetts, who also appeared before the committee, the MPs said that, given the importance of AstraZeneca to scientific research in the UK, it was essential the Government obtained further "longer-term guarantees" from Pfizer.
"Science is a long-term enterprise and it requires a genuinely long-term commitment. We are not yet convinced that this is what Pfizer is offering," the committee said. "If Pfizer is as committed to the UK as it claims, we hope that it will voluntarily strengthen - and lengthen - the promises that it has made. But the Govern-ment must be willing - and, crucially, able - to hold Pfizer to account if necessary."
While ministers on both sides of the coalition have insisted the Government is "neutral" regarding the takeover, which is ultimately a matter for AstraZeneca's shareholders, LibDems including Business Secre-tary Vince Cable have emph-asised they have the power to intervene if necessary.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article