POLICE kept the extent of hacking at the News Of The World out of the public eye out of "discretion" for victims, which included members of the royal family, jurors heard.
The paper's former royal editor Clive Goodman again said he had always been "open and honest" about his activities, despite being confronted with evidence on Wednesday he repeatedly hacked Kate Middleton, Prince William and Prince Harry.
He said that, compared with a colleague, he was just a "spear carrier" rather than the "five act opera" of hacking.
He told the Old Bailey, London, that, at the time he was caught, "there was not a single significant story broken at the News Of The World in the last couple of years" that the colleague, who cannot be named, had not got from tampering with phones.
Mr Goodman, 56, of Surrey, was dismissed in 2007 after he pleaded guilty and was jailed for hacking royal aides with private detective Glenn Mulcaire.
Under renewed questioning by the lawyer for Andy Coulson, the paper's former editor, he denied staying quiet about the extent of his phone hacking when he appealed against his sacking.
Mr Goodman said: "The reason these things did not come into the public domain before was the police and CPS in 2006/07 decided they were not going to publish things to protect the discretion of the victims."
The court also heard he hacked Ms Middleton's phone and listened to a message from Prince William telling her about being ambushed and shot with blanks on a night exercise at Aldershot.
Mr Goodman and Mr Coulson both deny conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office in relation to paying police for information. Mr Coulson and others also deny hacking phones.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article