A SENIOR detective has told a trial he was "awestruck" when he saw the naked body of Elaine Doyle which was covered by a blanket.
Detective Chief Inspector William Clark, now retired, said the crime scene had been "contaminated".
The trial - now in its eighth week - has heard differing accounts from officers who were called to a lane off Ardgown Street, Greenock, almost 28 years ago, about whether Ms Doyle's body was covered.
Mr Clark, 77, was the most senior officer there.
He told the High Court in Edinburgh that he took a few steps into the lane, which was only yards from Ms Doyle's home.
Advocate depute John Scullion asked if the teenager's body was covered. "It was, yes, it was covered by a blanket," Mr Clark told the trial. "At that time I had no idea where it came from. I was so angry at seeing it."
Mr Scullion: You told the ladies and gentlemen you were angry?" Mr Clark replied: "Awestruck."
He continued: "As a serving detective officer I knew that should not have happened."
Mr Clark said he asked whether forensic scientists had had an opportunity to examine Ms Doyle and ordered the blanket to be put aside and kept.
"No-one was actually owning up to why the blanket was on the body," he said.
Mr Clark said there were many people milling around. and a police photographer .
"By the time I turned round the blanket had gone from the body."
The body should have been left for forensic examination, he said.
John Docherty, 49, denies murder, has lodged a defence of incrimination and claims he has an alibi.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article