MINISTERS are expected to quit the Church of Scotland over the issue of gay clergy amid a new hardline revolt at this year's General Assembly.
Evangelicals have unveiled an 11th-hour bid to halt a move towards greater acceptance of the ordination of gay ministers in civil partnerships on the eve of the annual gathering in Edinburgh, which starts today.
An Edinburgh minister will call on around 730 clergy and elders to back the view that "marriage between one man and one woman is the only right and proper context for sexual relations".
The traditionalist push is likely to fail but could lead to a small number of ministers quitting.
Since the Kirk's struggle with the issue of gay clergy came to a head with the appointment of the openly gay Scott Rennie to an Aberdeen church in 2009, 13 ministers have left the Church, hitting 1% of the Kirk's 1389 congregations.
So-called liberal evangelicals have formed a network within the Kirk to push for a more traditional stance and their voice is expected to be heard in Wednesday's debate.
Under a counter-proposal from Rev Jeremy Middleton of Davidson's Mains Church in Edinburgh, gay ministers who remain celibate would be allowed.
Rev Middleton calls on the Kirk to: "Reaffirm the duty of the Church to minister to all people, regardless of their sexual orientation, recognising in particular the burden felt by those who struggle with same-sex attraction while striving to maintain a celibate life.
"Recognise that same-sex attraction is not, in itself, a barrier to leadership in the Church, including, without limitation, the ministry of Word and Sacrament, the diaconate and the eldership."
Two debates will take place on the same day, with the Legal Questions Committee hearing the hardline challenge and the Theological Forum suggesting backing the existing compromise, which allows congregations and Kirk Sessions to appoint a gay minister if they choose.
The forum said the current stance "offers greater transparency and legal security than an uncomfortable 'don't ask, don't tell' policy".
One evangelical alliance, Forward Together, welcomed the challenge while liberal group Affirmation Scotland said the move was disappointing.
Rev Peter Johnstone, of Ferryhill Parish Church in Aberdeen, who describes his position as progressive and is a member of Affirmation Scotland, said: "There is disappointment that this has been brought up."
He said that was the proposal presented last year by the conservative wing, with which the assembly had found compromise.
Forward Together said it "warmly commends this clear and concise statement of the Biblical position in relation to human sexuality and urges all commissioners to support it".
Ministers should "not act hastily" if it fails but regroup and "forward proposals for a united evangelical response", the group said.
The issue is likely to run into next year, with a call also from evangelicals to allow a vote on the result to go to presbyteries, and the same already planned if the status quo remains intact.
A spokeswoman for the Church said: "The Church confirms that Mr Middleton's counter-motion will be taken during the Legal Questions Committee debate on Wednesday. It is not appropriate to speculate at this stage on the outcome of that debate."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article