More than two-thirds of artists are not paid for showing their work at publicly funded exhibitions, a survey of UK artists has found.
The poll of 1000 artists across Britain also found many of them have to turn down offers from galleries because they cannot afford to work for nothing.
A leading artists' organisation has said that unless artists are paid, in future galleries will only be showing "work by the privileged few who can afford to work for nothing."
In the survey, 71% of artists - from new ones to Turner Prize shortlisted painters and sculptors - got no fee at all for taking part in publicly-funded exhibitions over the last three years
The poll, which included many artists based in Scotland, also found that 59% did not have their expenses paid, and 63% of artists have had to turn down requests from galleries to exhibit their work because they cannot afford to work for nothing.
The survey comes days after the Fruitmarket Gallery in Edinburgh became involved in a row over its now-cancelled plan of using free labour to install a new exhibition by the artist Jim Lambie.
Susan Jones, director of A-N, the Artists Information Company, said: "The research shows the practice of not paying artists is deeply entrenched in gallery culture and presents a worrying trend in publicly-funded exhibitions."
She said artists have suffered a drop in income in the last few years and now earn an average of £10,000 a year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article