LABOUR have heaped pressure on David Cameron after UK drugs firm AstraZeneca rejected an improved "final" takeover offer from US drugs giant Pfizer.
Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna accused the Prime Minister of "cheerleading for a takeover bid".
AstraZeneca's rejection came after a "fourth and final" proposal from Pfizer as a deadline for making a firm offer loomed.
It insisted that the terms undervalued the company and its "exciting prospects" - though a fall in shares yesterday left the British firm's market value nearly £18 billion lower than Pfizer had been prepared to pay.
The US giant's Scottish-born chief executive Ian Read urged the Astra board to engage in "meaningful dialogue", saying the offer represented "compelling and full value" and adding: "The time for constructive engagement is running out."
Prime Minister David Cameron said: "This is a matter for the companies to resolve themselves, the Government quite rightly should be neutral in this." Downing Street, however, confirmed that contact between the Government and both firms was continuing.
Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna said: "Labour and others have been clear from the outset that if this potential takeover is found not to be in the best interests of British science, jobs and industry it should not proceed. The next Labour government will act to introduce a strengthened public interest test to better protect Britain's science base."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article