RELATIVES of four Britons who went missing when their yacht capsized in the mid-Atlantic have made an emotional plea to the US Coastguard to resume the search-and-rescue mission to find their loved ones.
The call by the yachtsmen's families for the search to be resumed for the crew of the Cheeki Rafiki has been backed by an MP as well as prominent figures in the sailing world.
The 40ft Beneteau performance racer/cruiser yacht, ran into difficulties some 620 miles east of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, on Thursday while returning to the UK from a regatta in Antigua.
Contact with the ship's captain Andrew Bridge, 22, and crew members James Male, 23, Steve Warren, 52, and Paul Goslin, 56, was lost in the early hours of Friday while they diverted to the Azores. US and Canadian aircraft, assisted by three merchant vessels, looked for them throughout Friday and Saturday but called off the search yesterday at 5am local time as the weather deteriorated.
Some 4,000 square miles were scanned while signals were still being received from the vessel's two GPS beacons.
On Saturday, a cargo vessel which was helping the search spotted and photographed an overturned hull which matched the description of the Cheeki Rafiki, but there were no reported signs of people on board or a life raft.
Kay Coombes, the sister of Mr Warren, a project manager for an electrical company, said that she and their mother, Margaret Warren, were convinced he was still alive.
The 46-year-old said: "It's an utter nightmare, we are grateful for the US and Canadian coastguards for what they have done so far, but it's stopped too soon after two days, it's not long enough, we believe they are still alive.
"They are four strong-minded, physically strong sailors, they knew they were in difficulties and had every opportunity to get into the life raft which would have had provisions for several days. But if no-one is looking for them, they won't be found."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article