Plain-clothed parking enforcers could be empowered to confiscate disabled parking badges which are displayed incorrectly and prosecute suspected fraudsters.
"Blue badges" can save disabled drivers more than £6,000 a year in parking fees, the Scottish Parliament has heard. But the current badges are too easy to forge or tamper with, creating a temptation for non-disabled drivers to cash in, blind MSP Dennis Robertson told MSPs.
His Disabled Persons' Parking Badges Member's Bill will see the creation of new secure badges and empower non-uniformed enforcers to confiscate misused badges.
Anyone found displaying a blue badge in a car without the presence of the registered owner could be liable to prosecution, MSPs heard.
The Bill has been endorsed by transport minister Keith Brown, Holyrood's Local Government Committee and received the unanimous support of Parliament at its first stage yesterday.
Mr Robertson said: "Can I reassure members that when we look at confiscation it would only be carried out if it's felt that there is a justification to do so. In most cases I think an examination by an enforcement officer will probably determine whether that badge has been tampered with or is the badge of the person in the vehicle at the time."
Local Government Committee convener Kevin Stewart said: "People misuse badges for financial gain, either with fraudulent badges or using a badge when the badgeholder is not present.
"Given that, for example, in Glasgow city centre parking costs £3 an hour you can see the temptation."
Labour's Mark Griffin said his party backed the proposals, and Tory Cameron Buchanan, himself a blue badge holder, congratulated Mr Robertson for bringing forward the Bill.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article