REBEKAH Brooks has been the victim of a "witch hunt" in the hacking trial, jurors were told yesterday.
Concluding his closing speech, Brooks's lawyer attacked the prosecution for its "unhealthy focus" on the former News of the World editor.
Jonathan Laidlaw QC told the Old Bailey trial that his client had been portrayed as a figure of hate after it had emerged that Milly Dowler's phone was hacked during her editorship.
And rejecting prosecutor Andrew Edis QC's suggestion that her evidence had been carefully scripted, Mr Laidlaw compared Brooks's treatment to a witch in medieval England. "Without a doubt this case has not been a witch trial but the prosecution approach has been that of a witch hunt.
"If as Mr Edis would have you believe, what we saw was a mask, then Rebekah Brooks must be a witch with truly supernatural powers. What human mask could withstand that amount of scrutiny without cracking?"
Mr Laidlaw said the jury were likely to have been privy to more information about Brooks than anyone else they knew after her 14 days in the witness box.
Brooks, 45, of Churchill, Oxfordshire, denies conspiring to hack phones; conspiring to commit misconduct in public office and perverting the course of justice.
All seven defendants deny the charges against them.
The trial was adjourned until 10am on Tuesday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article