Foreign Secretary William Hague has condemned Russia and China's "indefensible" veto of a decision to refer atrocities in Syria to the International Criminal Court for the investigation of war crimes.
The UN Security Council resolution aimed at paving a path to justice in the conflict was backed by 58 countries, including the UK.
But Russia and China used their right of veto to halt action against all perpetrators of war crimes in the crisis, which is in its fourth year. Mr Hague said he was "appalled" by the move and added: "This was an opportunity for the world to stand up for justice for the Syrian people. Russia and China's actions in preventing this are indefensible.
"Russia and China are isolated on this issue and they will have to justify to the international community and the Syrian people, why they are continuing to shield those responsible for the most horrific atrocities from justice.
"These include organised use of torture and sexual violence, indiscriminate attacks on civilian populations, the deliberate withholding of humanitarian aid from those starving to death, and the sickening use of chemical weapons against innocent people."
The French-drafted resolution had overwhelming backing from the international community, including 13 members of the Security Council, 65 co-sponsors and more than 100 NGOs worldwide as well as the Syrian National Coalition.
Mr Hague also said the UK would intensify its efforts to ensure those responsible for atrocities faced justice.
Russia and China have used their veto four times to prevent action.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article