THE UK's public finances suffered a worse-than-expected start to the financial year as borrowing in April rose to £7.4 billion - £1.7bn higher than the same month in 2013.
The figure, which excludes the distorting effect of bank bail-outs, had been expected at £6.2bn.
However, separate economic figures from the Office for National Statistics were brighter, confirming gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 0.8% for the first quarter of the year.
Within this, the performances of the construction and manufacturing sectors were revised up from previous estimates, while household consumption rose for a tenth successive quarter.
But exports fell 1%.
Meanwhile, business investment rose 2.7% in the first three months of the year, the first time it has recorded five successive quarters of growth since 1998. It increased to £32.8bn, its highest level since the third quarter of 2008.
However, the data on public sector finances represent a headache for Chancellor George Osborne as the independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) targeted an 11% fall in the deficit for the current 12-month period.
Borrowing for April by the OBR's preferred measure - excluding the effects of the Bank of England's quantitative easing asset purchase programme - was £11.5bn, £1.9bn higher than in 2013.
Central government receipts were 0.3% lower at £50bn against the same month last year, including a 29.8%, or £300million rise in stamp duties to £1.1bn and a £400m increase in VAT to £9.8bn.
But income tax collected fell £800m to £11.1bn.
Whitehall spending fell 1% to £63bn.
Underlying public sector debt was £1.271 trillion, or 75.6% of gross domestic product, up from 73.8% at the same time last year but a slight fall on last month's 76%.
David Kern, chief economist at the British Chambers of Commerce, said: "Our budget deficit is still too high and reducing it over the next few years will be a difficult task."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article