universities in Scotland are sleepwalking into independence without realising the grave impact it will have on research funding, according to leading academics.
The warning comes in an open letter from 14 of Scotland's most noted professors in biomedicine and life sciences.
The letter says: "Growing out of our profound commitment to Scotland are grave concerns that the country does not sleepwalk into a situation that jeopardises its present success in the highly competitive arena of biomedical research.
"Life-sciences research provides thousands of high-technology jobs. It is now and can undoubtedly remain a cornerstone of the Scottish economy."
It adds: "We contend that Scotland's research interests will be much better served by remaining within the common research area called the United Kingdom."
The group includes renowned geneticist Professor Jean Beggs and Professor Karen Vousden, director of the Beatson's Institute of Cancer Research in Glasgow.
They also question the neutral role of umbrella group Universities Scotland and the Royal Society of Edinburgh (RSE), saying they have felt obliged to stay out of the debate as they get Scottish Government funding.
It adds: "Their silence should not be interpreted as evidence of tacit support for independence on the part of the life-sciences research community."
The letter is the latest salvo in an increasingly bitter battle between academics over the effect of independence. At the heart of the row is the structure of Scottish research funding.
The Scottish Government is the largest source of such cash, with £330 million allocated through the Scottish Funding Council in 2012/13 - a third of the total.
But the second-largest contribution is £240m, which comes from competitively awarded grants from the UK-wide Research Councils. UK-wide charities such as Cancer Research provided research grants in Scotland amounting to £121m in 2011/12.
Two rival groups, Academics Together and Academics for Yes, agree the best way to fund research is through the current structure.
Those who support the Union say it would be destroyed by independence, with no precedent for a funding system operating across international boundaries. They also point out that Scotland currently gets a higher proportion of research funding than it could expect to for its population.
But researchers who support a Yes vote argue a single research fund could be maintained, with Scotland continuing to punch above its weight because of the excellence of its research.
Professors Bryan MacGregor and Murray Pittock, on behalf of Academics for Yes, highlighted bilateral arrangements between the UK and the Republic of Ireland as evidence the structure could be kept.
"A sympathetic government in Scotland has provided short-term protection against the financial policies being imposed on universities in England," they said in a statement. "The real threat to research in Scotland's universities is not independence, but continued participation in the Union."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Our significant investment in research will be protected and indeed could be incentivised to encourage greater collaboration between universities and the private sector, supporting productivity and sustainable economic growth."
She said independence guaranteed an immigration policy that welcomes international students and research talent from across the world.
A spokeswoman for Universities Scotland said it stayed neutral because of the diversity of views in the university community.
She added: "It is for the people of Scotland to decide and it is for us, as an organisation, to respect that decision and then to secure the best possible outcome for universities under whatever constitutional arrangement is decided."
Professor Alan Alexander, general secretary of the RSE, said: "It is not correct to say that we have remained neutral because we are constrained, or feel constrained, by … government funding. The RSE, as Scotland's national academy, must remain neutral to allow it to enlighten and inform - rather than seek to influence - the debate."
l The independence debate must be conducted in a way that is a model for the world despite its intensity, Alistair Darling, leader of the Better Together campaign, said in a speech at Dundee University last night.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article