Income predictions for a Scottish share of oil and gas have decreased, new analysis shows.
The Scottish Government's own figures put the likely total between £2.9 billion and £7.8 billion in 2016/17, which could be the first full year of independence according to the SNP's timetable following a Yes vote in the referendum.
The range compares with predictions made last year that North Sea revenue would be between £4.2 billion and £10.7 billion for the same period.
Scottish Finance Secretary John Swinney said the central prediction shows the country can benefit from £34.3 billion over the next five years - equal to almost £7 billion a year.
The Office for Budget Responsibility, which was set up by the UK Government, makes far lower predictions.
The body expects just £15.8 billion over the five years - less than half Mr Swinney's preferred scenario.
But Mr Swinney said: "The future outlook for the North Sea remains strong as demonstrated by the very high levels of investment in recent years, with capital spending reaching £14.4 billion in 2013 - more than double the level observed in 2010.
"The impact of that investment is now becoming visible. The latest statistics show oil and gas output in February and March 2014 was approximately 3% increased on the same months of last year."
His latest analytical bulletin, the third since March last year, puts revenue at £5.8 billion in 2014/15, rising to £8.3 billion, before fluctuating between £6.9 billion, £7.3 billion and finally £6 billion in 2018/19.
The new Scottish Government analysis accepts forecasts are lower than last year.
"This can be largely attributed to two factors," the report states.
"Firstly, operating costs are now projected to be higher in future years than was assumed in the first analytical bulletin.
"This in turn reduces the profitability per barrel produced.
"Secondly, future production and the oil price are now both assumed to be lower than anticipated in the first analytical bulletin."
Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson MSP said: "The White Paper was already straining credibility as an uncosted wish-list but now even the SNP has been forced to admit that the oil figures they used to try and underwrite their fiction won't be achieved.
"While economic experts have been saying for some time that the figures for an independent Scotland don't add up, this is the first time that even Alex Salmond has admitted there's a multi-billion pound black hole.
"It is no wonder the Scottish Government stalled for so long on publishing these new statistics - the entire basis for their separation mathematics has been blown apart.
"All the experts advise caution when projecting oil revenues, even more-so when basing an entire economy upon it.
"Instead, even the SNP's most optimistic forecast falls short, leaving huge question marks over how to pay for public services like schools and hospitals in the event of separation."
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie said: "As part of the UK we can share the ups and downs of this volatile resource across broader shoulders and better protect public services.
"The nationalists £2.9 billion downgrade to their most optimistic oil revenue forecast is a stark reminder of how volatile this source of revenue is.
"Even after slashing their optimistic oil forecasts it is still double that of the independent OBR. This would create tough decisions over tax and spend which Scotland would no longer be able to share across the UK's broad shoulders."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article