A POSTCODE lottery has emerged after the introduction of a new law designed to solve "hedge rage" disputes between neighbours.
The High Hedges (Scotland) Act came into force in April, offering a legal route to resolving conflicts caused when shrubbery grows too large and blocks out light.
The bill was unanimously passed by MSPs but it allowed local authorities to set their own fees for processing applications, which can eventually lead to councils chopping down trees or hedges more than six and a half feet in height, without the permission of the owners, who are then billed for the work.
Research carried out by The Herald has revealed a wide disparity among fees set by local authorities to make applications, ranging from less than £200 in Stirling to £500 in Glasgow.
Figures obtained from Scotland's 32 councils have also suggested a direct link between the amount charged and the number of applications. Almost half of the 28 applications made so far have come in the four areas that charge less than £300, while just three have been made across the seven authorities that charge £400 or more.
SNP MSP Mark McDonald, who brought the bill to Holyrood, called on local authorities to ensure the legislation was accessible.
Dr Colin Watson, who led the calls for the legislation as campaign leader of the group Scothedge, accused some councils of overcharging and said allowing them to set their own rates had proved "a disaster".
Dr Watson, who has since retired from the group, said: The Government left the door open to improve the bill on review and we must hope that they quickly understand the disaster of uncapped local council fees.
"Those who have suffered from this problem and faced a bullying hedge owner - 15% had to call in the police - should not be paying for this at all."
According to Dr Watson, six authorities in England, which has similar legislation, make no charge. In Scotland, Stirling and Inverclyde Councils charge the lowest rate of £192. The two authorities, with a joint population of about 170,000, have had six applications between them compared to the three in the seven councils charging £400 or more, which have a collective population of more than 1.6 million.
Before the law was introduced, campaigners claimed high hedges were causing "misery" in some cases, with as many as 5000 disputes in Scotland. Overgrown shrubbery had been used as a "weapon" in planning disputes between neighbours, it was claimed, and ensuing confrontations were dubbed "hedge rage".
Mr McDonald said authorities should consider introducing discounts for pensioners or low-income families making applications under the law.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The High Hedges (Scotland) Act 2013 gives local authorities the discretion to charge a fee for administering a high hedge application to cover their own costs and the flexibility to set different fees to take account of different circumstances, as well as the ability to refund fees.
"Making an application is intended to be a last resort measure and certain pre-application requirements must be satisfied to prove that all reasonable steps have been taken by neighbours to resolve the issue before an application will be considered."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article