A CONTROVERSIAL windfarm proposal which would have earned the Scottish Conservatives' environment spokesman more than £8 million has been refused planning permission.
The 45 megawatt Ardchonnel windfarm would have been one of the largest in Argyll had it been allowed on the estate of Sir Jamie McGrigor.
However, councillors on Argyll and Bute Council's planning committee unanimously refused to grant the project permission yesterday, in line with recommendations from their officials.
Developers RWE Innogy now have three months in which they can lodge an appeal.
The Ardchonnel project would see 15 turbines, each 364ft tall, erected on the hills above Loch Awe, generating enough electricity to power 40% of the homes in Argyll and Bute.
The proposal proved unpopular among many of Sir Jamie's constituents, dozens of whom lodged formal objections claiming it would ruin the skyline and wreck the local tourist trade.
Sir Jamie, 64, an Eton-educated baronet who has been a Highland and Islands Tory list MSP since 1999, struck a deal with German energy giant RWE to develop Ardchonnel in 2011.
According to their agreement, he would receive £7,000 a year "base rent" for each megawatt of installed capacity, or up to £315,000, plus extra if the windfarm performed very well.
Index-linked over the 25-year life of the turbines, the site, which is currently used to graze sheep, should have generated over £8m.
Sir Jamie argues the windfarm would bring jobs.
However a planning officer report presented to yesterday's meeting in Ardrishaig said Ardchonnel was inconsistent with the local development plan "due to its adverse landscape, visual, and cumulative impact on the landscape setting of Loch Awe" and recommended refusal.
Sir Jamie declined to comment. RWE Innogy UK said they were obviously disappointed. They would consider their options before deciding how to proceed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article