National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden has claimed he worked undercover for the CIA, and said that he would like to return to the US.
He said in a television interview he had been "trained as a spy" and that he never intended to live in Russia.
Meanwhile US Secretary of State John Kerry called him a fugitive and challenged him to "man up and come back to the United States".
Mr Snowden, a former NSA contract systems analyst is living in Russia on a temporary grant of asylum after leaking a massive volume of NSA documents to the media. He was made rector of Glasgow University last month.
He told Brian Williams of NBC News that he had taken action in the belief that he was serving his country in exposing the surveillance programs of the NSA.
"I don't think there's ever been any question that I'd like to go home," Mr Snowden said in a segment of the interview broadcast last night.
"Now, whether amnesty or clemency ever becomes a possibility is not for me to say. That's a debate for the public and the government to decide. But, if I could go anywhere in the world, that place would be home."
Mr Kerry's comments came before NBC aired that portion of the interview. On the matter of Mr Snowden returning, Mr Kerry said: "If Mr Snowden wants to come back to the United States, we'll have him on a flight today."
He added: "A patriot would not run away."
Mr Snowden told Mr Williams that he worked undercover and overseas for the CIA and the NSA. He said he had a much larger role in US intelligence than the government has acknowledged.
"I was trained as a spy in sort of the traditional sense of the word, in that I lived and worked undercover overseas," he said.
National security adviser Susan Rice said in a CNN interview that Mr Snowden never worked undercover.
Mr Snowden said he never intended to be holed up in Russia but was forced to go there because Washington decided to "revoke my passport".
In response, Mr Kerry said: "Well, for a supposedly smart guy, that's a pretty dumb answer, after all.
"I think he's confused. I think it's very sad. But this is a man who has done great damage to his country."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article