A FLAGSHIP SNP policy to provide free nursery care for vulnerable two-year-olds is under-funded by more than £50 million, councils have warned.
A survey of local authorities concluded that overall capital costs could be as high as £114m - significantly more than the £61m suggested by ministers.
The discrepancy comes almost five months after the Scottish Government announced a commitment of 600 hours of early learning and childcare for up to 27 per cent of two-year-olds.
While welcoming the policy's good intentions, council umbrella body Cosla believes the Scottish Government have made incorrect assumptions regarding the cost of additional buildings and splitting provision between local authority and private providers.
Speaking before a meeting of Holyrood's finance committee today, Scottish Conservative finance spokesman Gavin Brown said: "The Scottish Government rushed through this childcare commitment without any thought for how much it would cost to upgrade buildings and create the new facilities needed. It has now taken them five months to finally come up with a capital figure, yet there are concerns from Cosla that this cost could be even higher."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We are committed to investing £280m over two years to expand funded early learning and childcare for three and four-year-olds - from 12.5 hours to almost 16 hours a week - from August, and to extend this entitlement to the 27 per cent most vulnerable two-year-olds, reaching about 15 per cent in the first year."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article