Former Crimewatch presenter Sue Cook has told a court Rolf Harris should not be accused of lying after forgetting a game show appearance in the 1970s because she cannot recall being on the programme either.
The 65-year-old writer and broadcaster, who appeared in the Star Games series two or three times, said celebrities were "bussed in" to a recreation area, and the city or town was "immaterial".
Harris had told the jury at London's Southwark Crown Court he had never been to Cambridge until four years ago, but it later emerged he had appeared in a Star Games show in the city in 1978.
One alleged victim claimed the entertainer grabbed her bottom when she was working as a waitress at an event there in 1975, although prosecutors say she may have got the date wrong.
Ms Cook yesterday told the court: "I said to my husband 'Gosh, that's not fair - I wouldn't have remembered it was Cambridge either'.
"I don't think he can be accused of lying because I can't remember it. I was a participant in that game show but I wouldn't have known it was Cambridge either."
She said that during her four decades in broadcasting she had forgotten "loads" of events she had been to. In cross-examination by Sasha Wass, QC, she admitted that she would not "swear blind" she had not been somewhere for work.
Harris is standing trial for 12 counts of indecent assault on four women between 1968 and 1986, all of which he denies.
Earlier, the court heard from Harris's former tour manager, Ken Jeacle, who said women fans would "rush up" to the performer and put their arms around him.
He would have to "extract" the star from those situations to avoid fans getting too close, the court heard.
The jury was sent home until Monday or Tuesday, when final speeches will begin.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article