AN INQUIRY has been launched to find out why the Edinburgh trams project spiralled beyond its original budget and timetable.
First Minister Alex Salmond announced that a judge-led inquiry would be held to determine how the infrastructure scheme became mired in delays and cost overruns, just days after the trams finally began running through the city.
However, key witnesses behind the fiasco could refuse to give evidence as the inquiry will be non-statutory, meaning the judge cannot compel individuals to appear.
Although Edinburgh City Council has agreed to co-operate fully with the inquiry, the arrangement opens the doors for other key witnesses, such as former TIE bosses Willie Gallagher and David Mackay or contractors Bilfinger Berger/Siemens, to refuse to give evidence.
Campaigners had been calling for a full public inquiry under the terms of the UK's Inquiries Act (2005), but the Scottish Government said a non-statutory equivalent would be a quicker and more efficient route to uncovering what went wrong because it offered the judge greater flexibility.
It comes after criticism over lengthy statutory public inquiries, such as the probe into the Vale of Leven Clostridium difficile outbreak, which began hearing evidence in 2010 and has yet to report its findings.
Speaking at First Minister's Questions yesterday, Mr Salmond said it was vital to understand what went wrong in order to prevent similar mistakes in future.
He said: "I'm sure everyone in Edinburgh and indeed all over Scotland will be delighted to see that the Edinburgh trams are fully operational and carrying passengers.
"We cannot, however, lose sight of the considerable public concern about the project, the disruption it caused to households and businesses in Edinburgh.
"I have therefore recommended to the Cabinet and it has been decided to establish a judge-led public inquiry to inquire into the Edinburgh trams project, to establish why the project incurred significant overruns in terms of cost and timing, requiring in particular a considerable reduction in the original scope.
"It is particularly important if any projects like it are being considered in the future that lessons are learned."
The scope, timetable and details of the inquiry, including which High Court judge will chair it, have yet to be confirmed but further details are expected before the summer recess.
Daniel Donaldson, an Edinburgh sdolicitor who has spearheaded the campaign for a public inquiry, said evidence should be heard from those affected by the chaos as well as those behind the project.
He said: "The terms of reference must afford those affected by the Edinburgh Trams fiasco the opportunity to have their voices heard.
"The terms must also allow a full forensic analysis of where the money was spent, whether the business case was actually viable, the qualifications or lack of experience of those put in charge, the contracts written, the forward planning that took place, the politics behind the project among many other important issues.
"Lessons will have to be learned from this project, and politicians and public officials will be held to account for their maladministration."
Trams began running in Edinburgh on May 31 this year, bringing to an end a saga which saw the cost to taxpayers balloon from £375 million to £779m at the same time as the route halved and the timescale doubled.
Scottish Labour's Shadow Minister for Transport, Mark Griffin MSP, said: "Given the massive cost to the taxpayer, far in excess of what it should have cost, the impact on residents and businesses in Edinburgh and the long-term ongoing financial cost to Edinburgh, this decision is right.
"Taxpayers, businesses and the people of Edinburgh need to understand what went wrong and how this can never happen again.
"This is not the first or only major public contract which has not run to time or budget. I hope that this inquiry provides the lessons we need to ensure that the way in which we contract, organise and deliver these projects in the future means that this never happens again."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article