NURSES and NHS staff are still not confident they will be protected if they speak out about lapses in care at hospitals, according to a group set up to defend whistleblowers.
However the group says even members of the public are often afraid to raise concerns. Kathleen White, of Patients First, said: "I've seen patients' relatives who don't want to complain -because they know their relative might be back in (hospital) again."
The group was commenting after Professor June Andrews, of Stirling University Dementia Services Development Centre, claimed NHS staff and politicians were colluding to present an unrealistic picture of hospital care.
She said the public should acknowledge that hospitals are dangerous, and called for a debate about the implications of understaffing and underfunding on patient care, particularly for those with dementia.
Chairwoman, Fiona van der Meer, spokeswoman for Patients First, said the organisation agreed with the analysis of Ms Andrews and added: "There is still not enough protection for people who want to speak out about poor care, and the NHS Scotland staff survey showed that most staff do not feel confident to do so."
Kate Fearnley, deputy chief executive of Alzheimer Scotland, said improvements in hospital care would not happen overnight.
"While I wouldn't be complacent about standards of care in hospitals, and the Mental Welfare Commission report highlighted the problems in continuing care for some of the most vulnerable people with dementia, I think it would be a pity to label hospitals as 'unsafe places'," she said.
The Scottish Government is holding an international dementia conference in Edinburgh today, at which experts from around the world will hear about Scotland's approach to improving the quality of care for people with dementia.
It is being held partly in response to the G8 Dementia Summit in London in December last year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article