FORMER US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton has said she feels "emboldened" to run for the presidency because of Republican criticism of her handling of the deadly 2012 terrorist attacks in Libya.
Mrs Clinton said the Benghazi attacks inquiry from Republicans gives her a greater incentive to run for the White House because she considers the multiple investigations into the attacks which led to the death of the US ambassador "minor league ball" for a country of the US's stature.
But she said that she is still undecided, adding: "It's more of a reason to run, because I do not believe our great country should be playing minor league ball. We ought to be in the majors.
"I view this as really apart from - even a diversion from - the hard work that the Congress should be doing about the problems facing our country and the world."
The ABC TV interview publicising her new book, Hard Choices, highlighted some of the key lines of criticism she could face if she runs for president in two years: her record as US president Barack Obama's top diplomat and charges by Republicans that she has been insulated from the everyday problems of Americans after more than two decades in public life.
Mrs Clinton said her family struggled with legal bills and debt when she and her husband left the White House in early 2001.
"We came out of the White House not only dead broke, but in debt," Ms Clinton said.
"We had no money when we got there, and we struggled to, you know, piece together the resources for mortgages, for houses, for Chelsea's education. You know, it was not easy."
Republican officials pointed out Mrs Clinton received a £4.7 million book advance for her 2003 memoir and said the comments reflected her insulation from the daily problems of average Americans.
"I think she's been out of touch with average people for a long time," said Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus, pointing to Ms Clinton's estimated £118,000-per-speech speaking fees and $8m book advances.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article