Scotland's councils have been warned to be careful they do not run out of cash for social care, as they offer people personal budgets to pay for the help they need.
Audit Scotland said the policy of self-directed support could transform social care over the next decade. But the spending watchdog said demand might exceed supply.
"(Councils) should take action to lessen the risks of overspending, which might mean they are unable to provide support for everyone who needs it," says a report on the policy.
Self-directed support is expected to increase choice and control for people with disabilities or age-related needs, allowing them to choose what care they receive and how they get it.
It will radically alter the way councils spend about £2.8billion a year on social care services, requiring them to offer a wider range of options to meet people's individual needs.
The policy has already led to disputes, particularly in Glasgow, where carers and users of learning disability day centres have objected to their closure.
The Scottish Government says self-directed support (SDS) can be paid for by reallocating existing funds.
But Audit Scotland said there was a risk prices would rise as charities and others offering help and support to people in their homes and communities had to deliver more personalised care.
Councils will have to plan how they will allocate money to all those eligible, as demand increases, the report says. "They should have plans for how and when to stop spending on existing services if too few people choose to use them."
While all councils have had to offer SDS since April, Audit Scotland says progress has been patchy.
Auditor General Caroline Gardner said: "The Scottish Government has given £42 million to help councils and other organisations prepare for self-directed support. It needs to have a strategy to measure and report on what this spending has achieved."
The Royal College of Nursing said there were questions about the vetting of people employed using SDS. Theresa Fyffe, the union's Scotland director, said: "How is a nurse to ensure a personal assistant paid for by SDS providing some nursing tasks is adequately trained and supervised?"
She also said nurses had concerns about cuts.
Ms Fyfe said: "Local authorities may have to make difficult decisions to stop providing existing social care services, such as respite care, if they become unsustainable as people opt for other services under SDS.
"However, there will be some people who will want those traditional services and may end up falling through the gaps. How can the NHS and local authorities work together to stop people falling through such gaps?"
Councillor Peter Johnston, health spokesman for the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, welcomed the report and said councils faced challenges in implementing SDS against a background of cuts and rising demand.
"The report acknowledges it will take time for councils to shift spending away from traditional services, towards giving people individual budgets, and the report's focus on examples of good practice in this areas is welcome," he said.
Glasgow carer Tommy Gorman, a campaigner against the closure of day centres in Glasgow, called for ministers to commission independent research on the experiences of those receiving SDS.
He said: "For some categories of vulnerable adults choice has effectively been removed from the social care agenda with little regard for the impact on the people who depend on these services or the families who support them."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article