THE SENIOR lawyer defending the man accused of murdering Elaine Doyle has told a jury that the police probe into the teenager's death was a "shambles".
Donald Findlay QC said that detectives did not properly secure the area in Greenock, Inverclyde, where 16-year-old Ms Doyle's body was discovered in June 1986.
At the High Court in Edinburgh yesterday, Mr Findlay said the way officers acted had caused evidence that was collected at the scene to become contaminated.
Mr Findlay said that DNA evidence against his client John Docherty, 49, was unreliable.
He said that the jury could not trust it when it came to consider its verdict.
Comparing the police investigation to a poisoned tree, Mr Findlay told the jury: "When a tree is poisoned it isn't just the tree that is poisoned; the fruit of the tree is poisoned and you should never eat the fruit of the poisoned tree."
Mr Findlay also suggested that some police officers who had given evidence at the trial had told lies about what happened in the early stages of the investigation.
Mr Findlay was speaking to the jury on the 50th day of proceedings against Mr Docherty, of Dunoon, Argyll who denies murdering Ms Doyle on June 2 1986.
The advocate spent the entire court day delivering his closing speech without referring to notes.
During his address, Mr Findlay said that when police were collecting forensic evidence from Ms Doyle's body, officers did not wear protective clothing.
The trial in Edinburgh, which is being heard before Judge Lord Stewart, will continue on Monday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article