CALLS have been made in Holyrood for a high-tech treatment to be made available in hospitals that can spare men the severe side-effects of prostate cancer surgery.
Health secretary Alex Neil was asked if there had been any discussions about introducing the American Da Vinci robot which is widely used in England and mainland Europe.
The question was put by Cameron Buchanan, Conservative MSP for the Lothians, who said the health service in England has 33 of the specialised robots, while there are none in Scotland.
Mr Neil gave no commitment about whether the machine would be introduced or whether arrangements would be made for Scots to go to England to get the treatment on the NHS.
He said he would report on the outcome of an assessment being made on their use by the NHS's national planning group in due course.
"There have been extensive discussions on the use of robots in prostate operations, particularly in the west of Scotland and Grampian," he said.
"The national planning group is looking at the issue in great detail, including the lessons that can be learned from America, where robotic surgery is used much more extensively."
It was revealed last month that the machines had not been introduced in Scotland, despite being widely used in the United States for the past decade.
The robot is the latest advance in keyhole surgery. It has a 95 per cent success rate in arresting prostate cancer. A major benefit of the delicate nerve-sparing procedure is that it reduces the risks of incontinence and impotence that are almost inevitable in conventional open surgery.
Drew Lindon, head of policy and campaigns at Prostate Cancer UK, said: "Men with prostate cancer in Scotland are being left behind, and the exchanges in parliament on the matter shed little light on when, or indeed if, they will be given the same treatment choices as men south of the border."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article