SCOTTISH health boards have been asked to suspend the use of mesh implants after a campaign by women who have suffered serious side effects after having the material used in procedures.
Health Secretary Alex Neil said an independent review will be set up urgently to report on issues related to mesh procedures, including complication rates and under-reporting of "adverse events".
Campaigners described the suspension and review as "welcome and unexpected".
Transvaginal tapes and meshes are used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
For most patients the implant is effective, but a number of women have come forward after experiencing problems including abdominal and pelvic pain, urinary problems, painful intercourse, scarring and the need for further operations.
At a meeting of Holyrood's Public Petitions Committee, Mr Neil said he has now asked the Acting Chief Medical Officer to write to all health boards urging them to suspend the use of mesh until evidence from both the Scottish Government's independent review and an EU study are available next year.
Mesh campaigner Olive McIlroy, 57, one of two petitioners who brought the issue to the committee, said afterwards: "It was the decision we were hoping for, and we're very glad the minister made it, but he could have made it a year ago."
During the meeting, Mr Neil said: "No-one should have to experience the level of suffering that some of these women have had."
Mr Neil said 1,850 women have mesh implant surgery in Scotland each year, with official complication rates of between 1% and 6%, but problems were probably "substantially under- estimated" due to under-reporting of "adverse events".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article