PARENTS of babies whose ashes were secretly disposed of by crematorium staff will be consulted on plans for a fitting memorial to their children.
Edinburgh City Council has published a plan following recommendations made in a report on the scandal at Mortonhall Crematorium, where the remains of stillborn and dead newborn babies were disposed of without their families' knowledge over decades, from 1967 to 2011.
Former Lord Advocate Dame Elish Angiolini made 22 recommendations for the council and other agencies to pursue in her 600-page report, which was published in April.
These included that the council should review how the crematorium is managed, ensure the location of interment of remains is recorded in future and discuss options for memorials with parents.
The council said its working group had given "sustained and proper consideration" to each of her recommendations.
Immediate actions include discussions with the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency about existing practice and permits and the introduction of an infant cremator.
There has also been an exchange of letters between the council and the Scottish Government, as well as the Federation of Burial and Cremation Authorities and the Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management.
The council will hold talks with the charities Sands and Simba about when the time is right to open discussions with parents about improving the landscaping and the design of a fitting memorial to their child.
The council report and plan will be discussed at a special meeting on Thursday.
Council chief executive Sue Bruce said: "I would like to re-iterate my sincere apologies to the bereaved families for the distress they have suffered as a result of the practices at Mortonhall Crematorium."
Other measures in the plan include a review of staffing in bereavement services and the development and introduction of a management and leadership programme.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article