ALEX Salmond will claim today that £1 billion spent on social housing over the past three years is good for "our economy and good for our society".
The First Minister will highlight the SNP government's spending as he and the rest of the cabinet travel to Selkirk, in the Borders, for a question-and-answer session with voters.
He will confirm the £1bn bill since 2011. It is due to rise to £1.7bn by the end of this Holyrood term in 2016.
But he will claim Westminster gets the benefit of savings resulting from lower housing benefits costs in Scotland as he calls for greater economic powers to be handed to Scotland.
Mr Salmond will say: "Scotland is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, more prosperous per head than France, Japan and the UK itself - but we need the economic powers that come with independence to make the most of our huge resources.
"That means being in control of our own finances rather than having them in the grip of Westminster.
"For example, since 2011, this Government has spent £1bn on social housing. By the end of the parliament, we'll have spent £1.7bn."
The SNP leader will point out that rents are lower north of the Border because more housing is available, adding: "It's an investment which is good for our economy and good for our society. If housing rents are lower, the Government has to pay out less housing benefit.
"The Scottish Government pays for our 30,000 affordable homes during this parliament. But the benefit, lower housing benefit costs, flows to the UK Government. So, at the moment, we invest in policies but the savings go to Westminster."
Mr Salmond is expected to add: "There is a similar issue with childcare. One of our most important ambitions is a transformation in childcare in Scotland."
Holyrood's Education and Culture Committee will vote tomorrow on plans to increase annual funded childcare for three- and four-year-olds to nearly 16 hours per week and extend this to disadvantaged two-year-olds from August.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article