The war of words over the installation of average -speed cameras on the main route to the Highlands has been stepped up amid claims that lorry drivers might renew their threat of driving in a convoy as a "rolling roadblock."
The war of words over the installation of average -speed cameras on the main route to the Highlands has been stepped up amid claims that lorry drivers might renew their threat of driving in a convoy as a "rolling roadblock."
The warning was originally issued last year in a campaign by hauliers and drivers to persuade the Scottish Government to raise the speed limit for heavy lorries from 40mph to 50mph on single carriageways on the A9. They had said they could work with average-speed cameras if the limit was raised.
When ministers agreed to a three year trial with the higher speed limit, lorry drivers called off their action. But there are reports that delays of around 20 minutes in traffic caused by installation of the cameras, have led to drivers considering resurrecting the threat.
The Inverness lorry driver Conor McKenna, who led last year's campaign, said his colleagues were reporting an increase in dangerous manoeuvres because of the delays, with motorists slamming on their brakes when they see the cameras even although they are not yet operating.
He reportedly said: "People don't understand the cameras." And added: "We are looking at a go-slow but I need to speak to more drivers about what is happening."
But Dave Thompson Skye, SNP MSP Lochaber and Badenoch said a convoy protest would be "utterly irresponsible."
He said "The lorry drivers had campaigned for a raising of the speed limit and the government listened. The higher limit will now come into operation in the autumn."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article