A BRITISH TV personality was among seven other women who claimed Rolf Harris had groped them, but their evidence was not allowed to form part of the prosecution case at his trial.
The unnamed woman had wanted to speak about allegations she was molested by the presenter anonymously from behind a screen. Details emerged during pre-trial hearings, but were not put to jurors and can only now be reported.
Prosecuting, Sasha Wass said the woman was taking part in an interview with the Australian in a "very public place"in 1996 when he assaulted her, but did not mention the claim to anyone at the time.
Ms Wass told the hearing: "The alleged incident took place with the defendant's hands going over her clothing and up her thigh and higher still when she abruptly drew the interview to a halt. He cupped her buttocks which she describes as groping."
The interview then came to a halt, she said.
Another evidence ruled inadmissible at Harris's trial included a woman who said she met Harris in 1977 aged 14 at a motel near Sydney. It is claimed he touched her bottom and waist, before pushing her up against a door and saying: "Rolfie deserves a cuddle". He then allegedly followed her to the lift and touched her breasts, trying to stop her leaving.
In 2005, it is also claimed Harris grabbed a woman who was working at a pub where a party was being held for broadcaster Michael Parkinson and started to kiss her neck in front of his wife, Alwen.
A fourth woman said she met Harris while being interviewed by the BBC during her art class at a leisure centre in Belfast in 1991. She said he forced his tongue into her mouth. Another woman, then 13 or 14, claimed he made lewd comments during an event near his Berkshire home.
A 24-year-old woman alleged that while she was on holiday in 1999 Harris touched her breasts and got into her bed for a sexual encounter. Another woman, then aged 20, said Harris touched her bottom during a photocall in London.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article