The number of criminal cases resolved within a target time dropped by 10 percentage points after a string of court closures, according to research by the Scottish Conservatives.
Figures obtained by the party show the percentage of summary criminal cases completed within 26 weeks in justice of the peace courts fell from 74% last October to 64% in April.
In the sheriff courts the figure dropped from 73% to 68% over the same period.
Scottish Court Service (SCS) plans to close 10 sheriff courts and seven justice of the peace courts were accepted by the Scottish Government and backed by MSPs last year. The first wave of closures took place in November, with courts in Annan, Cumbernauld, Irvine, Motherwell, Dornoch, Kirkcudbright and Rothesay shut. Closures took place in Arbroath, Cupar and Stonehaven in May.
The SCS denied the delays were due to closures.
The new figures also show the average time for a summary criminal case to be resolved in a justice of the peace court increased from 152 days in October to 177 days in April. Over the same period the average sheriff court duration increased from 136 days to 147.
Scottish Conservative justice spokeswoman Margaret Mitchell, who obtained the figures through a series of parliamentary questions, said: "The Scottish Government was adamant there would be no impact on cases once these closures were implemented.
"But clearly this is not the case as evidenced from these figures, and this is a situation which can only get worse as more courts face closure across the country."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article