THE Iraqi parliament's inability to agree on a new government in its first session was a "regrettable failure", Iraq's most powerful Shi'ite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, has said in a sermon delivered by his aide.
Mr Sistani intervened a week ago in Iraq's political crisis by urging lawmakers at their opening session to put aside disputes and form a new government to tackle an insurgency spearheaded by an al Qaeda splinter group that could fracture the country.
But on Tuesday parliament's first meeting since its election in April ended without progress toward a government after Kurdish and Sunni Muslim lawmakers walked out, complaining that Shi'ite Muslims had not decided on a prime minister.
Mr Sistani's aide Ahmed al-Safi said in a sermon yesterday: "Last Tuesday the first session of parliament convened.
"People were optimistic that this would be a good start for this council in its commitment to the constitutional and legal texts.
"But what happened afterwards, in that the speaker and his deputies were not elected before the session finished, was a regrettable failure."
The prime minister has traditionally been Shi'ite in Iraq's governing system set up after the USs toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003, while the speaker of parliament is Sunni and the largely ceremonial president is Kurdish.
None of the blocs has settled on a nominee. Opponents of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki blame his divisive rule for the worsening crisis and are demanding he be replaced.
Mr Sistani also reiterated his call for the new government to have "broad national acceptance", a formulation many officials have interpreted as a signal Mr Maliki should step aside.
The comments came as up to 30 insurgents were reportedly killed after Iraqi government airstrikes targeted Islamic militants trying to capture the country's largest oil refinery.
Fighters from the Islamic State group have been trying to capture the Beiji facility.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article