THE safety of passengers "must come first," David Cameron has said as security was stepped up at British airports amid fears that terrorists are working on a bomb that could sidestep current measures.
The Prime Minister said he hoped the measures would not cause unnecessary delays but stressed that no risks could be taken with passenger safety.
Changes to security measures were announced after Washington Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson ordered beefed-up security at foreign airports that have direct flights to the US, reportedly as a result of intelligence that groups in Yemen and Syria had joined forces to plot an attack.
Mr Cameron told the BBC: "We take these decisions looking at the evidence in front of us and working with our partners.
"This is something we've discussed with the Americans and what we have done is put in place some extra precautions and checks.
"The safety of the travelling public must come first. We mustn't take any risks with that.
"I hope this won't lead to unnecessary delays but it's very important that we always put safety first, and we do."
The increased security measures will include closer scrutiny of personal electronics and foot- wear. These actions come amid fears that individuals with Western passports who have travelled to Syria and Iraq to fight with Islamist extremists could be used to smuggle devices onto planes.
l The Foreign Office yesterday updated its travel advice on Uganda after the authorities in Kampala warned of a possible continuing terror threat at Entebbe Airport.
The advice reads that the Ugandans are "concerned about the possibility of a further attack" and have issued a number of alerts warning of a heightened risk of terrorism.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article