The Scottish Government has spent almost £219,000 on overseas trips for ministers and their officials in the last three years, figures show.
In 2012-13, the last full year for which figures are available, the bill for overseas visits amounted to £99,595.24.
Between April and December last year, a further £53,418.63 was spent, while the total for 2011-12 was £65,912.08 - amounting to £218,925.95 since 2011.
Tory chief whip John Lamont said the Scottish Government had been "secretive" about the spending, and had only published all the details after action from the Information Commissioner.
A visit that Health Secretary Alex Neil and an official made to Boston, Ohio and Washington in the US last December to sign a memorandum of understanding and to learn from the American healthcare system cost £9,055.55.
A trip by First Minister Alex Salmond and three officials to the US last April cost £4,998.88, while Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland made two trips to America to mark the 25th anniversary of the Lockerbie bombing.
His trip to Syracuse University in New York last October cost £3,424.79 then in December he went to Washington, with the bill for that trip amounting to £2,119.00. On both occasions Mr Mulholland was accompanied by three officials.
But Mr Lamont said some of the visits - such as a trip by External Affairs Minister Humza Yousaf in July 2013 to Latvia for a song and dance festival at a cost of £720.44 - would leave the public "scratching their head".
The Conservative MSP said: "Why, for instance, when the Scottish Government doesn't have responsibility for external affairs, are dedicated ministers going to dance festivals and cultural visits?"
A spokesman for John Swinney said: "This is the height of hypocrisy from a Tory party which at Westminster, thinks nothing of spending £13 million in a single year on flights and hotels for just one department, the Foreign Office."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article