Harriet Harman has suggested Gordon Brown sidelined her as prime minister because she was a woman.
The Shadow Culture Secretary last night linked the former prime minister's decision not to make her deputy prime minister to her gender and recounted how she was relegated to a dinner for leaders' wives at a major summit.
Ms Harman was elected as the party's deputy leader in 2007, the same year Mr Brown entered No 10.
Ms Harman said: "Imagine my surprise when, having won a hard-fought election to succeed John Prescott as deputy leader of the Labour Party, I discovered I was not to succeed him as Deputy Prime Minister.
"If one of the men had won the deputy leadership would that have happened? Would they have put up with it? I doubt it. And imagine the consternation in my office when we discovered that my involvement in the London G20 summit was inclusion at the No 10 dinner for the G20 leaders' wives."
She recalled former cabinet colleague Caroline Flint's denunciation of women being used as "window dressing'."
Ms Harman also claimed she had been urged to fit in by being "clubbable" in the bars of Westminster but her refusal to toe the line led to a "nasty" response, including from her own colleagues, who briefed the papers when she suffered mastitis.
On Twitter, Mr Brown's former spin doctor Damian McBride described her comments as "utter bilge". He added: "As every man and woman who ever worked for him could attest, Gordon judged people on only one thing: were they useless or not."
Ms Harman responded by pointing out Mr McBride was sacked for "denigrating women and he is doing it again".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article