A 17-year-old Eton schoolboy mauled to death by a polar bear during an adventure holiday had found a paw print just two days before the lethal attack, an inquest has heard.
Horatio Chapple was sleeping in his tent when the bear went on the rampage, inflicting fatal injuries to his head and body, in the Arctic Ocean's Svalbard islands.
Lauren Beech, who was also on the expedition, said she also found out after the incident that local authorities had issued a warning about increased polar bear activities in recent months before the attack.
She said Horatio noticed the prints of the polar bear on August 3. She added: "We were advised by the leader they were approximately two to four days old and they were facing in the direction of base camp.
"I remember there was more than one there, one was very distinct and I remember several of us taking photos with this print."
She added: "It may make me sound naive but I remember thinking 'Wow, it's a polar bear footprint' but I do not remember it making me any more worried."
She continued: "I had heard rumours another group had seen a polar bear ... apparently there had been a warning issued by the authorities in Svalbard that there was heightened activity of bears, but I wasn't aware of that."
Miss Beech said she had been concerned about the tripwire around the camp and that she did not consider it to be "very robust".
She also questioned the action of leaders who asked the group for their views on whether a bear watch should be held on the night before the attack.
She said: "The leaders laid out why they thought a bear watch wasn't required - they said it was a low-risk area.
"I couldn't understand at the time. As a 16-year-old and a young person I had no knowledge of the area and I put my complete trust in the leaders' knowledge."
Fellow team member Scott Bennell-Smith backed a bear watch, but the decision had rested with the leaders.
The inquest continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article