Ed MILIBAND is leading Labour to defeat at the hands of the Conservatives and has proved a worse leader than Neil Kinnock, former cabinet minister Charles Clarke has said.
Blairite Mr Clarke said that Miliband had failed to produce an "overall story" to explain to voters why they would be better off with Labour in government.
Speaking to the Huffington Post, the former home secretary said Mr Miliband and shadow chancellor Ed Balls were wrong to reject claims Labour overspent in office.
And he attacked the Labour leader and shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper for "ignorant and ill-informed" apologies for Labour's handling of immigration, insisting the party was right to open the doors to workers from eastern Europe in the 2000s.
Mr Clarke rejected suggestions personality issues will prevent Mr Miliband becoming prime minister. Asked if the Labour leader passed the test that voters could imagine him at 10 Downing Street, he said: "He does actually. I think he has a problem with the population, undoubtedly. He is an intelligent man, he'd be a good prime minister."
But comparing him with Lord Kinnock, who took Labour to defeat in 1987 and 1992, he said: "Neil has far, far more qualities than Ed Miliband as a leader. Neil was a fantastic leader."
And he said the "most likely outcome" of next year's general election was an overall majority for the Conservatives. Asked whether Labour could convince voters of its economic credibility in time for the May 7 poll, he replied: "I don't completely exclude it but I think it's unlikely."
Mr Clarke - who served in Tony Blair's government from 1998 to 2006 - said that, under Mr Miliband, Labour was "not remotely near" providing the necessary narrative of where it felt it succeeded or failed in Government. He said critics were right to say Labour spent too much while in power, accusing Gordon Brown of overspending "not very, very dramatically but significantly" between 2006 and 2008.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article