HEALTH chiefs have been criticised after it was revealed they have spent more than £7 million in the past two years on sending NHS patients to private hospitals.
New figures show NHS Grampian has sent more than 2,000 people to Glasgow, Edinburgh and Dundee for operations since 2012 to meet strict waiting time targets.
The embattled health board, which is grappling with an unprecedented recruitment crisis, said it hoped to cut spending on private healthcare with the opening of four new operating theatres at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and Woodend Hospital.
But the spiralling bill has angered patient watchdogs, who say taxpayers' money should not benefit private healthcare companies.
Jean Turner, of Scotland Patients Association, said boards had to be open with the Scottish Government on the challenges they were facing in meeting waiting time targets. She said: "It always makes me angry when the NHS is spending taxpayers' money in the private sector like this.
"I feel it is bad management that we don't have the core staff to deal with this problem.
"The private healthcare sector is in it for the easy bits. They don't train doctors or nurses and any problems with treatment tend to be fixed by the NHS.
"It is unacceptable when the NHS's bill for private healthcare goes up like this.
"Health boards are obviously struggling to meet targets and they have to rely on the private sector to make it work."
New figures show that just under £4 million was spent in 2012-13 on private hospital bills, up more than tenfold on the year before, and last year the total came to £3.1 million.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article