SURVIVORS of one of Australia's deadliest wildfires are to be awarded nearly £246 million in a class action settlement, the largest such compensation in the nation's history.
The fire, which killed 119 people, was the biggest in a series of blazes that tore through the southern state of Victoria in 2009, leaving 173 people dead and destroying more than 2,000 homes in just over a day.
More than 5,000 people joined the class action against electricity provider SP AusNet, arguing the firm was negligent because it had not maintained its power lines, which caused the fire.
The group also sued Utility Services Corporation, which SP AusNet hired to maintain the lines, and the Victoria state government.
The defendants have now agreed to pay a total of almost A$500m.
Lawyer Andrew Watson, who represents the plaintiffs, said the settlement still needed final court approval and it would then take 12 to 18 months to distribute the payouts.
He said: "No amount of money will ever compensate those who were affected by the fire for the losses they have suffered.
"But this settlement of nearly A$500m represents a measure of justice and some real compensation that will ease the financial burden of their suffering."
SP AusNet said it had agreed to the settlement but had not admitted liability.
The company said the conductor that broke and sparked the fire had been damaged by lightning.
Lead plaintiff Carol Matthews said: "It has been a tough, gruelling five years since the fire killed our son, left our daughter without her big brother and destroyed our home.
"There is so much pain that is still very real, but today there is also a sense of justice."
The blaze caused an estimated A$1 billion worth of damage and was part of a series of fires which became known as Black Saturday.
The settlement was reached after a 16-month trial in the Victoria Supreme Court.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article