THE Chief Constable of Police Scotland has been asked to explain to the public the rationale behind officers carrying side arms while on routine patrol in the Highlands.
Dave Thompson, MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch, says he has written to Sir Stephen House in light of violent crime in Scotland being at an all-time low.
He said: "As there is clearly very real public concern on this issue, it would be useful as a means of allaying the public's fears and for transparency on the matter, if Sir Stephen would elaborate further on the specifics behind this policy.
"I have written to Sir Stephen House explaining that I think it would be meaningful if the public were made privy to the reasons behind the firearms policy being applied in the Highlands. I appreciate it is a sensitive matter, however, having met Sir Stephen earlier in the year. I know him to be a reasonable man and, as such, I look forward to his response."
At present, 275 officers across Scotland have standing authority to carry firearms on routine patrol although only a small number are on duty at any one time.
Sir Stephen has already written to David Alston, deputy leader of the Highland Council explaining: "In reaching this decision, my executive colleagues and I considered a range of factors including prevailing intelligence, threat and risk assessments; the proportionality of any authority and the need to deliver equity of specialist resource across the country."
He said that, above all, the decision sought to ensure consistent protection of communities and police officers in the Highlands and across Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article